Decisions of the Examination Appeals Board

In the overview below, you will find the verdicts of the Examination Appeals Board for the past 10 calendar years. All rulings can be downloaded in anonymised form.

Result 1 - 20 of 149 results

CBE15.005 - Determination fraud and sanctions imposed

Year: 2015 Faculty: Nijmegen School of Management Defendant: Examination Board Business Administration Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE15.005 - Determination fraud and sanctions imposed
CBE15.010 - Not providing a laptop during examinations

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: (Partly) well-founded

Case number CBE15.010 - Not providing a laptop during examinations
CBE15.012 - Deadline overrun and changing judicium to ‘cum laude’

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Social Sciences Defendant: Examination Board Psychology Verdict: Admissible and unfounded

Case number CBE15.012 - Deadline overrun and changing judicium to ‘cum laude’
CBE15.022 - Not granting degree

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Arts Defendant: Examination Board Advanced Master International Development Verdict: Incompetent

Case number CBE15.022 - Not granting degree
CBE15.039 - Participation exam resit

Year: 2015 Faculty: Nijmegen School of Management Defendant: Examination Board Business Administration Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE15.039 - Participation exam resit
CBE15.040 - Establishing final course grade

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Defendant: Examiner of the subject Practical Philosophy 2 Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE15.040 - Establishing final course grade
CBE15.041 - Establishing final course grade

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Defendant: Examiner of the subject Practical Philosophy 2 Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE15.041 - Establishing final course grade
CBE15.046 - Assessment thesis

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Social Sciences Defendant: Examination Board Educational Sciences Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE15.046 - Assessment thesis
CBE15.056 - Assessment internship

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Social Sciences Defendant: Examination Board Educational Sciences Verdict: Manifestly inadmissible

Case number CBE15.056 - Assessment internship
CBE15.057 - Among other things, obligation to participate in Professional Conduct Mentor Group

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Medical Sciences Defendant: Examination Board Dentistry Verdict: Partly well-founded, for the remainder unfounded or inadmissible

Case number CBE15.057 - Among other things, obligation to participate in Professional Conduct Mentor Group
CBE15.065 - Extension examination validity period

Year: 2015 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE15.065 - Extension examination validity period
CBE16.014 - Final assessment

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Defendant: Examination Board Philosophy Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE16.014 - Final assessment
CBE16.016 - Sanctions imposed after established fraud

Year: 2016 Faculty: Nijmegen School of Management Defendant: Examination Board Business Administration Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE16.016 - Sanctions imposed after established fraud
CBE16.023 - Thesis defence process

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE16.023 - Thesis defence process
CBE16.026 - Course assessment; syllabus content; peer review; adversarial process

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Science Defendant: Examination Board Faculty Science Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE16.026 - Course assessment; syllabus content; peer review; adversarial process
CBE16.029 - Late filing of appeal

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: Manifestly inadmissible

Case number CBE16.029 - Late filing of appeal
CBE16.031 - Assessment exam question

Year: 2016 Faculty: Nijmegen School of Management Defendant: Examination Board Business Administration Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE16.031 - Assessment exam question
CBE16.033 and 16.034 - Plagiarism; formal defects

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Philosophy, Theology and Religious Studies Defendant: Examination Board Philosophy Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE16.033 and 16.034 - Plagiarism; formal defects
CBE16.045 - Final assessment, substantive assessment, marginal review role Board

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: Unfounded

Case number CBE16.045 - Final assessment, substantive assessment, marginal review role Board
CBE16.047 - Extension examination validity period

Year: 2016 Faculty: Faculty of Law Defendant: Examination Board Law Verdict: Well-founded

Case number CBE16.047 - Extension examination validity period